<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/</link>
	<description>The online home for Mark Cahill, and indeed, all things Cahill!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Challenge &#187; Aggregating - Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>The Challenge &#187; Aggregating - Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingscahill.com/?p=486#comment-494</guid>
		<description>[...] It is finally live so I can talk about it. Some time ago David asked how to aggregate 100+ feeds in a single site. He got some very interesting answers, most notably one pingback from Mark Cahill. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is finally live so I can talk about it. Some time ago David asked how to aggregate 100+ feeds in a single site. He got some very interesting answers, most notably one pingback from Mark Cahill. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingscahill.com/?p=486#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Now there&#039;s a thought... an RSS on the fly that aggregates several other feeds and that can be customized by the readers based on the originating feeds information. 

I need 50-hour days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now there&#8217;s a thought&#8230; an RSS on the fly that aggregates several other feeds and that can be customized by the readers based on the originating feeds information. </p>
<p>I need 50-hour days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cahill</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingscahill.com/?p=486#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Thanks Esteban - glad to hear you took the bait! I can&#039;t wait to see what you&#039;ve come up with.

The ability to do a search and get results was piloted by the Baltimore Sun newspaper a couple years ago.  I&#039;d guess it&#039;s kind of like creating an rss feed on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Esteban &#8211; glad to hear you took the bait! I can&#8217;t wait to see what you&#8217;ve come up with.</p>
<p>The ability to do a search and get results was piloted by the Baltimore Sun newspaper a couple years ago.  I&#8217;d guess it&#8217;s kind of like creating an rss feed on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingscahill.com/?p=486#comment-449</guid>
		<description>First thing first: very nice new home for your blog. 

Won&#039;t disclose too much here, but I took your advice  and built this around categories mainly. Those are: sport, language and country. 

I made it work like filters, thus you can combine any or all categories to get the feeds for those combinations. I also made it into a WP plugin which I might release publicly over time. That is if I can set myself to make it nicer &amp; more generally useful in the future. 

I purposely neglected to base this filters on any user given information but rather on our manual categorization of the feeds. This is due to the crazy times we&#039;re managing, we can&#039;t possibly get our bloggers to tag correctly quickly enough to rely on that. But aggregating and sorting on that pieces of information that the authors themselves provide is probably going to make noise on my head on the upcoming months. 

I really like your idea on search. I think this is somewhat unexplored ground (we search webpages daily, but feed content very rarely).

A good way to do this could be caching feeds somehow and taking advantage of what the feed owners add as bulk information (categories, tags, keywords). 

Feeds work mainly for changing content, so the question rises: how much / for how long to cache?

Food for thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thing first: very nice new home for your blog. </p>
<p>Won&#8217;t disclose too much here, but I took your advice  and built this around categories mainly. Those are: sport, language and country. </p>
<p>I made it work like filters, thus you can combine any or all categories to get the feeds for those combinations. I also made it into a WP plugin which I might release publicly over time. That is if I can set myself to make it nicer &amp; more generally useful in the future. </p>
<p>I purposely neglected to base this filters on any user given information but rather on our manual categorization of the feeds. This is due to the crazy times we&#8217;re managing, we can&#8217;t possibly get our bloggers to tag correctly quickly enough to rely on that. But aggregating and sorting on that pieces of information that the authors themselves provide is probably going to make noise on my head on the upcoming months. </p>
<p>I really like your idea on search. I think this is somewhat unexplored ground (we search webpages daily, but feed content very rarely).</p>
<p>A good way to do this could be caching feeds somehow and taking advantage of what the feed owners add as bulk information (categories, tags, keywords). </p>
<p>Feeds work mainly for changing content, so the question rises: how much / for how long to cache?</p>
<p>Food for thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Churbuck</title>
		<link>http://www.allthingscahill.com/2008/04/blog-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>David Churbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allthingscahill.com/?p=486#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Wow. Dude. That is epic in terms of helpful information. Most awesome. I&#039;m telling Esteban to come look ASAP
dc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Dude. That is epic in terms of helpful information. Most awesome. I&#8217;m telling Esteban to come look ASAP<br />
dc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

