Read the following statement:
The media is utterly biased. Obviously biased sources like (choose one: Fox News | The New York Times) spout a constant stream of propaganda from (choose one: the dastardly Republicans | the evil Democrats | our Alien Overlords) which is meant to deceive us from the truth.
The problem we face today is that the way in which we get our news is fundementally changing. Instead of getting a cross section of the news that someone really smart (read news editor) thought we’d need to know, we’re as likely getting our news from heavily biased secondary sources, also known as blogs, forums, etc. We forget that a blog like this one is roughly analagous to the content you’d get from a columnist in a newspaper. That means it’s opinion. Opinion is, by its very definition, biased.
So as we decry the problem of media bias in the primary sources of media, we’re gravitating to sources that are in fact much more biased. We move from Fox News to Drudge Report or Instapundit, from The New York Times to the Huffington Post. And in the process we’re losing out on the local, we miss the voice telling us that something should be on our radar, not merely showing us that which is already on our radar in a way that reinforces the way we already percieve it.
The problem is that when we have start to move from a primary source to a secondary news source, we’ve got to fill in for all the other stuff. Like the weather (okay, we add a widget for weather to our desktop) or traffic (we get an sms update to our cell phone), but there is so much else. Do we really want to have an obituary widget so we can watch for notices on people we know?.
We’re moving to a model where we’re only as good as our information, and our access to information is limited by our ability to find, process and filter that information.