Today is: Thursday, 2nd September 2010
Log in
Technology, Web Development and Saltwater Fly Fishing, not in that order.
- The online home for Mark Cahill, and indeed, all things Cahill!
- About
- Photo Gallery
- Subscribe
Social Media – Participation Rates Much Lower Than We Thought…
Jeremiah Owyang from Forrester has a great post up entitled ” Why Some Don’t Need to Join the Conversation“. The basic premise is that even though social media has been so very hot in the past year or two, actual participation by users remains at a relatively low percentage of overall visitors.
To prove my point, let’s start with data: In most markets, (even youth) there are no bars that span 100% for creators. In fact, 18-24 year olds in United States only are creators 39% of the time. 45-54 year olds in UK only create online content a paltry 6%, although they are critics 11% of the time.
So what does this tell us? Not everyone is part of the online dialog exchange. Not everyone will ever be part of the online conversation.
This point has really been driven home lately to me as I’ve become more directly involved in the Reel-Time Community again. In discourse with a few readers, I’ve mentioned “well, you’ve only been a member for the past two years,” only to be told that they were actually lurkers back well into the last decade. In two distinct cases, that means they waited at least 8 years before registering or posting on a site they use almost daily.
So what’s it all mean? My feeling now is that you’ve got to assume that the active participants on your site are the tip of the iceberg. They’re responsible for helping to make the experience rich and vibrant, but you’ve got to realize that many of your dedicated users may actually never really contribute.
New information? Not hardly…we’ve been discussing the lurker factor on online bulletin boards since pre-internet days.
Tags: bulletin boards, forrester, jeremiah owyang, lurkers, participation rates, social media
Reader's Comments
Leave a Comment
About Us
I'm Mark Cahill - Online community developer and content management wonk since 1995. I'm interested in new media, communities and social networking, and love saltwater fly fishing. For a longer version, you can read my full about us page.
I am mncahill on Twitter
Email me at allthingscahill at gmail
My Facebook Page
![]() |
Subscribe RSS |
| Subscribe Email |
Recent Posts
Tag Cloud
apple Automattic Broadcast Media chain of lights chris anderson cnn Dave Brubeck david churbuck facebook geek.com google iphone jason calacanis journalism layoffs lenovo leo laporte linkedin long tail Music Video newspapers new york times niche communities niche social network olympics online community building orange county register print media Red Sox reel-time.com safari Saltwater Fly Fishing social media social media 101 Social Networking Striped Bass Sutton Sutton Chain of Lights Sutton Ma twitter Web 2.0 Web Design Wordpress Wordpress 2.5 wordpress 2.7Categories
On Twitter - mncahill
- @dchurbuck What did you do? Drop an old Buick down there? in reply to dchurbuck 1 hr ago
- @dchurbuck Indeed - Netflix ad campaigns have kept me from subscribing for some time. in reply to dchurbuck 7 hrs ago
- My bullet points for Corporate Social Media aspirants. http://bit.ly/cx7tC7 1 day ago
- RT @ThePsychicCat: @mncahill MAH SOURCEZ SEZ "YEZ - DEFINITLY" Q: will the #redsox make the post season? 1 day ago
- @thepsychiccat - will the #redsox make the post season? 1 day ago
- More updates...
Recent Comments
- Nano Serwich: Good set of reminders Mark....
- Mark Cahill: Love it...indeed, it will be replaced with "something bigger...
- Ray Magner: In my opinion twitter is the testing ground for future commu...
- Gerald: There is no place for V8 in social media, period....
- Mike: I agree , "Nothing major" ......
- David Churbuck: Happy, happy belated birthday Mark!...
- Mark Cahill: On that one, I wait for the next release. Production stuff ...









Actually Web Participation rates vary, some are VERY active it depends on the demographic market
Go check out the profile tool I linked to from my post, you’ll see that people participate in many different ways:
Creators
Critics
Collectors
Joiners
Spectators
and Inactives
Right – I really am just looking at the ratio of Creators/Critics to the other groups. I see creators and critics as the active forces in the site, the “answer people” who provide the real benefit.
The spectators, inactives, etc. in my experience vastly outnumber the creators and critics, as your numbers suggest, even among the younger users.
I’m not tempted to start pulling my numbers apart. The only issue is that most of my spectators aren’t registered, so it’s hard to separate them from the unqualified traffic of search engines, spambots, etc.