Today is: Monday, 15th March 2010
Log in
Technology, Web Development and Saltwater Fly Fishing, not in that order.
New Site: BayStatePowerWashing.com
Over the past few weeks I pulled together a new site for my friend Ryan Mowry, owner of BayState Power Washing. The site is built in wordpress and uses a fairly standard template. Points to consider:
- This is a test of a new localized SEO tactic.
- The site hadn’t been indexed yet by Google yesterday, the last time I checked.
- Site is fully editable by Ryan.
- We did include a blog, where Ryan will be posting information of use to Massachusetts home owners.
- I’m not a fan of 100% width sites…
Give the site a check – especially if you’re looking for the best power washing service in Massachusetts for your home or business.
Say What You Do For SEO Success
Jeff Bennett had a great post yesterday about a shop that had changed their name to take advantage of the customer’s common name for them
I said it absolutely made sense and I fully agree. Indeed from my experiences @ NameMedia this is exactly the way it is. I learned first hand the power and impact of generic names as we built our media business. It costs a lot of money and effort to create awareness for nondescript names and brands. It is hard to break through the clutter. Brand building today has to take into account a lot of things and generic and descript names have proven to rise to the top in Google. The Shopkeeper surely gave me an astute rationale for changing the shop name.
The domain name is one of the key SEO characteristics that Google uses in the algorithmic results. Hence if you want to perform well in a certain local, like Sutton, on a particular keyword, like Septic Cleaning, I’d consider buying that domain name and pointing it at a n optimized landing page for that town and keyword. If I wanted to perform well in the another town, I’d do another landing page.
So even though my business name might be “Cahill Septic Cleaning” I could still get the google juice from Sutton Septic Cleaning, plus any of the surrounding towns. Then I could also watch my analytics package and see what type of traffic I am getting from those domains, to see if they’re worth the yearly fee.
The good news is that most localized landing pages are available. Think about investing in them today!
Your World is About to Change – Google and Augmentative Computing
The past two have been very interesting if you follow the technical goings on at Google. In no particular order, they have released, at least in beta format:
- Google Chromium OS – the Google operating system which offers about all the functionality most folks would require to surf the web, get email, write basic docs, etc.
- Google Goggles - a system that allows your Android based phone *(Android is their mobile phone os) to use it’s camera to identify via search people, places and things. All you do is open the Goggle app, point your camera at something and it can tell you what it is. Think facial recognition for your phone, but that is only the tip of the iceberg. You might also use this as the start of a query, such as point at a product and then request “nearest vendor”.
- Google Translation and YouTube Closed Captioning working together – in essence they have the technology to do to do a similar presentation as Goggles that would act as a real time live translator via the camera phone.
- They have enhanced the predictive results produced by Google Suggest when you start typing in to the Google search box.
- They have enhanced the command line capabilities of the Google search box – try entering an airline flight number or weather new york and see what happens.
- Establishment of the Data Liberation Front within Google to ensure all data contained in Google applications is easily portable.
There’s been a lot off hot air generated on each of these topics, along with prognostications that Google is getting ready to take on Microsoft, particularly when it comes to the browser. I don’t believe this is the case. I think Google isn’t looking to compete head on head with anyone, it is my supposition that they are in fact trying to make a quantum leap ahead of everyone.
What I see is a company that is:
- Carefully pre-positioning themselves against anti-trust legislation, both in the US and in the EU by avoiding the traps MS fell into in the past. Hence Data Liberation and their development of apps vs. including some of their developments as features in their OS.
- Attempting to keep their system interfaces as stripped down and command line like as possible.
- Producing real time use type applications.
To my mind, they are setting themselves up to enable voice based OS navigation. If it’s command line interaction, the technology exists to allow that interaction to happen via voice. Then throw in vision based search, such as Goggles, or tie in on the fly translation via the phones microphone, and you’ve reached a new level of computing. Think augmentative computation, where your actually getting real time data from that little computer in your pocket.
When that happens, everything in our lives will change.
A Few Coherent Thoughts on Murdoch Blocking Google
Yesterday Rupert Murdoch, Chairman of News Corp, said that he was going to have Google blocked from all New Corp. websites. That means something
From EditorandPublisher.com:
The Chairman of News Corp. said in an interview with Sky News Australia (reported here in MediaWeek U.K.) that once the newspapers get their paywalls, News Corp. plans to pull its content from the likes of Google and others.
Murdoch said: “We’d rather have fewer people come to the Web site and pay. Consumers shouldn’t have had free news all the time — I think we’ve been asleep. It costs us a lot of money to put together good newspapers and good content. No news Web sites anywhere in the world are making large amounts of money.”
Immediately the web went all a flutter, myself included, predicting that that Murdoch would rue the day. Joe Mandese at Mediapost.com noted:
According to an analysis of Google-generated traffic released late Monday by Experian’s Hitwise service, Google and Google News currently account for more than 25% of the daily traffic to the Wall Street Journal’s WSJ.com site.
That’s an awful lot of traffic to put at risk. Now the other side of the coin is that Murdoch knows that showing tons of traffic low cost network ads begging them to Punch the Monkey or telling them they just won a lottery is the absolute path of least resistence. You go there when you have nothing else to possibly do… (more…)
Google Kills 6 Services
Google announced late last week that they were killing 6 of their services, Dodgeball, Google Catalog Search, Google Mashup Editor, Google Notebook, Jaiku, and Google Video. Additionally, the Jaiku service is going to be an open source project from here on out.
In addition to Google’s announcements about the elimination of 100 recruiting positions and the shutdown of offices in Austin, Texas; Trondheim, Norway; and Lulea, Sweden, the company said it would close Dodgeball, Google Catalog Search, Google Mashup Editor, Google Notebook, and Jaiku. It also said it’s discontinuing the ability to upload videos to Google Video.
Okay, Google isn’t infallible. Most of this makes sense, certainly the moves to eliminate redundant development paths such as with Mashup Editor and without question Google Video, which should have shutdown within weeks of the YouTube purchase years ago.
Still, I question stopping development on Google Notepad (it will remain available for the foreseeable future) which was a useful project that isn’t redundant and is in fact, quite unique. I suspect that little development projects won’t be the future for Google. The question we then ask is what do we lose? Will we ever see the benefit of the Google 20% development projects again? Indeed, do we really expect the 20% development rule will still be in effect? I think not…
Tags: google, Google Notepad
How Technorati Gave Away Their Special Sauce
I used to use Technorati to find compelling blog posts to share and comments. It was rather convenient to be able to go to one spot and find out what people were saying in blogs around the globe and to easily search. One of the most compelling features, for me, was that it was an application designed with blogs only in mind.
This morning I was looking a set of compelling blog posts on the anniversary of 9/11. So I fired up my Google Chrome browser and headed over to Techorati. Strangely, the homepage was infested with non-blog newsources such as cnn.com, time,com, etc. The ration of mainstream media to blog posts on the homepage was around 3 to 1, with blogs drawing the short stick.
So I did a search on my topic, and once again, tons of mainstream media results, although they were at least clearly identified, once again my results bore lots of topics from big media.
Part of the problem is that lots of big media is now using blogs as a part of the content strategy. The New York Times is blogging using Wordpress MU and many other papers and news channels are as well. Hence they get submitted along with the rest of the unwashed masses. And since they’re big media with big readership, they jump to the top of the authority heap. Authority is one of the measures that Technorati uses to rate your blog – in my case, an authority of 9, which used to be 40+ when I blogged at Vario, and a rating of 705,000 or so, vs. the Vario rating somewhere under 100,000k when I was active there.
I guess blogging has come to the big time and media’s realized it finally. I just wonder if there’s going to be any room for the rest of us when all is said and done.
Resources:
Technorati. Old Tools Don’t Die. They Gather Dust. – Global Neighbourhoods
What’s wrong with Technorati – Neville Hobson
Technorati and Me – Thornley Fallis
Tags: cnn, content strategy, google, mainstream media, new york times, news channels, technorati
Blog Aggregation
David Churbuck posts this morning on Blog Aggregation. We both did a blog aggregation project over at Reel-Time.com in 2003 which, as he notes, was well ahead of the curve (and probably the need). He’s got some excellent points, but I have a few things to add.
The idea of a blog is something that many of us don’t fully understand. It’s basically an online journal that was designed to allow users without server level access to maintain their own content and easily switch the appearance of that content via templates. Over time, they have become so much more.
One of the most powerful things about a blog is that the presentation you are most likely seeing, my own template on my site, isn’t necessarily the way everyone will see the content. RSS, which is essentially an XML stream of content, allows us to present our content in many different formats and many different places. The promise of XML, as it was presented a decade ago, was that it would allow us to separate content from presentation, and in that, it is indeed one of the few technologies to have fully delivered on it’s promise.
So we now have blogs, with all kinds of neat little RSS feeds which are quite granular, down to the category or tag level, that allow us to slice and dice our content, to mix and match by category, by author, etc. I’ve looked at the aggregators that Churbuck mentions, and basically barfed…yeah, they work, but their ugly and they don’t have to be. We should be able to easily design pages that will consume the rss feeds and present them in a useful manner.
I’ve been saying for years that the most misunderstood bit of blogs is their categorization capabilities. The better you categorize, the more useful your content (although you can also use tags…).
My ideas:
- Remember to sort by categories – make it easy to allow users to find what they want.
- Remember to provide direct links to the authors.
- Let users set up searches that trigger rss feeds so your content can reach them when it’s appropriate. And you can even allow search to create a page on the fly if you’ve got enough content.
- Leverage internal as well as external assets – you can use outside streams, although you may want to be able to editorially decide which bits of content you will present on your site. You can literally scavenge posts via Google Blog Search and Technorati.
- Think of your pages as homepages – each topic or category you present should be optimized as though it will be the only one your readers will see.
- You can have multiple feeds from blogs, some summarized, some containing the full content, and some broken into categories, tags, etc. They can be reassembled into larger groups (all my authors writing about javelin throwing) in interesting ways.
Consuming RSS feeds and rendering them on pages is easy stuff and can provide that deep niche content we want. There’s no reason to settle for out of the box tools that make our content look like one of those “portals” companies pushed in 2001.
In the example Churbuck offers of the Olympics, I’d consider setting up pages for:
- Countries
- Main sports categories, track and field, swimming, martial arts, etc.
- Social and off the field categories
- Major celeb pages – some of the athletes get a lot of mentions, provide their own pages
- Search – once again, it’s key…
Then you ensure your bloggers are tagging properly and you’ve got the start. In fact, you can even have an editor retag stuff as “lead story” etc. This stuff works for splogs and it can work for high volume content situations as well!
The real take away secret is this: aggregation is simple content management. Think of it that way and you’ll jump way ahead of the pack.
Tags: blog aggregation, david churbuck, external assets, reel time, rss aggregation, simple content management, xml stream

12 Mar 10 |
Let’s say you own a business. It’s a small business, and you’ve tried very, very hard to build it into something. Along the way, like most businesses, there have been bumps, but for the most part, you’ve got a bunch of customers who love you. Then one day, right in front of your door, someone puts up a huge billboard, and on it, they will allow anyone with anything to say about your business to put up whatever they want. All of a sudden you’ve got some really nasty comments about your business hanging there where any potential customer will see them.
I’m ready to vent here. Are we, as community builders, becoming so lazy that we don’t want to take the time to build in the social media features we want for our sites, the way we want them? Do we really need to have Google package them up and provide them for us, the way they want them?
Traffic stats – the red headed step child of statistics, damned lies cloaked inside a slathering of untruth and then wrapped in that un-Godliest of file formats, xls and used to bludgeon all that is sane and rational out of your web strategy. This is the stuff that reduces grown webmasters, those mastadonian throwbacks of an earlier tech era, to tears, and enables the airline magazine reading, conference attending execs to think they actually have a handle on what’s happening.









